If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person driving BM520 motor vehicles as a duty.

1. On October 2, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: (a) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.141% of alcohol content on October 17, 2013; (b) led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle at the influence of alcohol level of 0.141%, and (c) led the front of the Sejong Station of the 388-lane from the Seoul bank.

A person engaging in driving service follows the vehicle behind the vehicle running in the same direction, he/she shall perform his/her duty of care such as securing a distance necessary to avoid any collision with the vehicle running in the same direction when the vehicle driving ahead of it suddenly stops, despite of negligence, the latter part of the vehicle driving in the same direction as that of the vehicle driving by the victim C (59 years of age and South) of the victim C (59 years of age and South) who was driving in the same direction due to negligence, and shocked the back part of the vehicle driving by the victim E (36 years of age and South) who was driving in the front of the vehicle driving in the same direction.

The above shock caused injury to the victim C, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim E, such as brain salvin, which requires medical treatment for approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same time as that of the preceding paragraph, driven the said vehicle at approximately 10km from the upper end of the road transport in the direction of 0.141% alcohol concentration in blood at the same time as that of the preceding paragraph to the upper end of the Sejong East East East East East East East East East East East East East-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on traffic accidents, reports on driving of jun drivers, reports on de facto statements of jun drivers;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (8) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (the point of gross negligence in the line of duty) concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;