Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Defendant

A and the victim B are the legal couple married in 2011, and they now proceed with a divorce lawsuit, are under way and is under way, and they are under way.

In addition, the victim applied for a victim protection order against the defendant from October 13, 2015 to the time when the victim protection order is decided by a provisional protection order (Prohibition of access within 100 meters from the victim's residence, workplace, and means of communication). The defendant was aware of the same fact by receiving a certified copy of the decision of provisional protection order from the court on October 15, 2015.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated an ad hoc protection order by accessing the victim's place of work at the entrance of the E Hospital located outside the entrance of the E Hospital, approximately 70 meters away from the victim's place of work, on October 20, 2015, in order to ask for the victim's mind that the victim could not know about the part of the child being raised because the contact with the victim could not know about the part of the child being raised, and find out the part of the child's mind.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of relevant photographs, internal reports (the distance between the place where the person suspected of being suspected and the office where the victim works) and certified copies of an ad hoc protection order shall be applied by statutes;

1. Relevant Article 63 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Crimes of Domestic Violence and the Selection of Punishment, etc. concerning Crimes of Domestic Violence and Articles 63 (1) 2 and 55-4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Crimes of Domestic Violence;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;