beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.10.12 2018고합297

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 25, 2018, from around 23:13 to 23:27 the same day, the Defendant driven a DNA strawing vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.109% from the section of approximately 4.5 km to the following roads of the 210 Health Insurance Evaluation Institute via the 210 Health Insurance Evaluation Institute, as from the side of the 23:25th of Jun. 25, 2018, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.109%.

2. On June 25, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, and around June 23:17, 2018, the Defendant discovered that police officials are under the control of traffic alcohol in the front bank while driving a DNA strawing car according to four-lanes of the 210 Health Insurance Review Evaluation Institute, Gwangju, as the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju.

At the time, the police moved towards the Defendant’s vehicle in order to regulate drinking at the front direction, so it is dangerous for the police to attack the police if they proceed as they are, despite the risk of shocking the police, the Defendant suffered the injury of the victim, such as three lanes from the four-lanes, two-lanes, and one-lane change from the three-lanes in order to avoid drinking control and to escape, and the victim, who was in the three-lane change from the three-lane, while driving the vehicle in front of the driver’s seat of the Defendant, while driving the vehicle above the floor, while driving the vehicle above the floor, the victim’s right f (21 years old), who was in front of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle, was driving with the front wheels of the Defendant’s driver’s seat, and the victim suffered the injury of the victim, such as the right-side executives and the non-standing executive members who need to give approximately 16 weeks medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant, using dangerous articles, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of F who is a police officer, and suffered injury to F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the Police with G, H and F 1.