However, with respect to Defendant A, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2019 Highest 878"

1. Joint offenses committed by Defendant A, B, and C;

A. On May 2017, Defendant A, B, and C had led customers to purchase a vehicle with a higher level than the market price (hereinafter “fit goods”) by showing other vehicles and leading them to purchase, without notifying the selling price of the relevant vehicle to customers, and selling the relevant vehicle at a lower level than the arm’s length price (the price added to the seller’s selling price). Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B, show other vehicles to the customers who reported and found the fit goods, and led them to purchase, and play a role in inducing them to purchase, and Defendant C, as if not officers and employees of the fitial company, did not act as if they were the loan manager, and as if they would undermine the terms and conditions favorable to customers.

Defendant

A and Defendant B, at around 10:00 on May 16, 2017, moved to 10:00, to H used car advertising advertisement in the Hambs Skis Skis 350D passenger car advertising in the Hambs-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, G, “it is possible to grant a discount of up to 20 million won on condition that the sale price of the above vehicle is at least 23 million won but at least 10 million won out of the purchase price, to receive an installment loan. Alternative loan means that Incheon is at low cost, and around 13:00 on the same day, the victim moved to 1st floor in Seo-gu, Incheon Special Metropolitan City, and then Defendant A had a problem of credit standing. However, it is possible to ascertain that the victim was a representative of 40 million won and 40 million won, rather than a representative of DaB.