2. Of the appeal costs, the part pertaining to the participation in the appeal is the intervenor joining the Plaintiff.

A. On June 5, 1998, the Plaintiff entered the Army as CB and was discharged from military service on August 6, 1998.

B. On January 8, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State for “mental disease, perfection, perfection, and persuasion.”

C. On September 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the record of discharge from military service was confirmed under the diagnosis of a mental body at a private hospital or at a military hospital; (b) recorded the applicant’s life record as “non-majors” in the major or non-major examination report and the medical examination report; and (c) confirmed that the applicant’s statement was merely recorded; (b) even though the fact that the patient was duced on the nursing record, it appears that most of the mental illness occurred due to a disease caused by astronomical and qualitative factors, such as two damage related to the public service, and that there was a medical advisory opinion from a specialist who is unable to find the identity of the person eligible for veteran’s compensation; (d) stated that there was no special probability on two parts related to the public service; and (e) stated that there was no substantial causal causal relation between the applicant’s statement and the military service or that there was no objective and indirect causal relation with the occurrence or aggravation of the disease due to the military’s performance of duty.

On October 7, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the instant disposition with the Defendant.