If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 22:00 on January 30, 2013, the Defendant ordered the victim D, who is an employee of the Defendant, to pay the alcohol and the alcohol immediately if he/she had the alcohol and the alcohol in the high seas at the point of “C” located in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si.

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price immediately even if he was provided with an alcoholic beverage or a credit card because the Defendant did not possess cash or a credit card to pay the liquor price at the time.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, did not pay the total amount of KRW 130,000,000, even though the Defendant received know-how equivalent to the market price of KRW 120,000 from the victim, which is equivalent to the market price of KRW 120,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to A by the police;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.