Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The defendant's claim was dated September 17, 2014.

A. The summary of the case is the case where the Plaintiff and other enterprisers for construction business in the bidding procedure for the construction work for the construction work for the construction project for the high-speed high-speed rail, which the Korea Rail Network Authority orders, jointly agreed that if the Plaintiff and other enterprisers jointly set a successful bidder for each construction section in advance and receive a successful bid for each construction section or fail to receive a successful bid for each construction section, the share in the participation of joint contractors shall be given by the Defendant on the ground that the part against the Plaintiff among the corrective measures under Articles 21 and 22 of the former Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (hereinafter “Fair Trade Act”) constituted an unfair collaborative act under Article 19(1)3 and 8 of the former Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act, and seek revocation of the Defendant’s corrective measures against the Defendant

[Attachment 2] The relevant statutes are as shown in [Attachment 2]

나. 전제된 사실관계 【증거】갑1의 2와 변론 전체의 취지 ⑴ 당사자 ㈎ 현대건설㈜(이하, 회사의 이름에서 ‘㈜’는 모두 생략한다), 대우건설, 삼성물산, 에스케이건설, 지에스건설, 대림산업, 현대산업개발(이하, 7개 회사를 ‘7개 대형건설사’라 한다), 롯데건설, 케이씨씨건설, 한진중공업, 삼환기업, 두산건설, 쌍용건설, 동부건설, 금호산업, 경남기업, 남광토건, 원고, 삼성중공업, 한라, 코오롱글로벌(이하, 14개 회사를 ‘원고 등 14개 건설사’라 하고, 7개 대형건설사를 포함하여 ‘원고 등 21개 건설사’라 한다), 고려개발, 계룡건설산업, 극동건설, 두산중공업, 포스코건설, 풍림산업, 한신공영(이하, 7개 건설사를 ‘7개 건설사’라 하고, 21개 건설사를 포함하여 ‘원고 등 28개 건설사’라 한다)은 건설업을 목적으로 하는 회사로서 공정거래법 2조 1호에 정해진 사업자이다....