However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 1, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Seoul Central District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 3 million from the same court on September 4, 2009 to the same crime, respectively.

At around 14:15 on August 28, 2016, the Defendant driven BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.081% while under the influence of alcohol with 0.081%, from the 551-4-on the chip of Gyeonggi-si to the chilling road in the Gyeonggi-si, the GM5 vehicle.

Accordingly, even though the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, he again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the control results of drinking driving, and report on the situation of drinking driving;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2);

1. Photographss (on the front and rear sides) of each accident scene, and drinking photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, references to criminal records, amounts of dispositions, and reporting Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor (the power to commit the same kind of crime, and the occurrence of a traffic accident);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (a crime following the following day after voluntary confession, reflectivity, and previous drinking);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (not less than a suspended sentence of imprisonment)

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;