2. Although the judgment of the court below has favorable circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and his depth reflects the defendant's depth, there is no same criminal history, there is only the criminal history of fine, there is a family member to support the defendant, and there is no economic condition. However, the defendant's period of the crime of this case is shorter, and the amount of swine with the country of origin is not smaller, and there is a lot of social harm to the crime of this case, so severe punishment is necessary, and the court below seems to have imposed punishment by reducing the amount of fine under the summary order after sufficiently considering the circumstances alleged by the defendant, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance that can be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below is sentenced, and there is no other special circumstance or circumstance that there is no change in sentencing newly after the sentence of the court below, and in full view of all the circumstances that form the conditions for the argument of the crime of this case and the sentencing as shown in the records after the crime

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.