In the event of receiving compensation, the payment of the compensation was agreed to be made.”

However, the Defendant had no property under his/her name, and had already been in excess of his/her obligation such as 60 million won borrowed money, and even if he/she was paid compensation, he/she could not receive part of the compensation. Therefore, even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party, he/she did not have any intent or ability to pay the borrowed money.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received 20 million won check from the victim around April 12, 2012 from the victim, and received 65 million won in total from around the above day to November 5, 2013, as shown in the annexed crime list.

Judgment

1. The Defendant asserted that he lent the Defendant’s money of KRW 100,00 to Chokdong D, and that in relation to this, E, who was in de facto marital relationship with Chokdong D, decided to repay the instant money to the Defendant as the land expropriation compensation was paid. The Defendant attempted to pay the Defendant the instant money to the Defendant as the Defendant was paid with D, and that D did not pay the Defendant the instant money to the Defendant, unlike the promise, on the wind that D did not pay the Defendant the amount of KRW 10,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

The argument is asserted.

In addition, at the time of the defendant's husband F's market price of 450,000 won or more, the defendant's husband F was capable of making payment.

The argument is asserted.

2. In full view of the witness F, E, and D’s testimony, financial transaction details (F), certified copy of real estate registry, etc., the Defendant lent money to Chokdong D at least KRW 150 million, and D.