When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:00, on the front side of the house located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, for the reason that the former victim C (67 years of age) was dissatisfied with E, a defendant's seat in the ethic ethic ethic of the former victim C (67 years of age) and caused the victim to suffer approximately 6 weeks of childcare.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second pleading);

1. Part concerning C’s statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement made to C by the police in the protocol; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 257(1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act for the Selection of Fine (the repeated crime of this case should be criticized for the defendant without being able to do so even though he has multiple criminal records of the same kind, and even during the period of a repeated offense of the same kind. However, it should be taken into account that the defendant paid 1 million won to the victim for the compensation of damages, and the damaged person does not want the punishment against the defendant, that the defendant would not be punished against the defendant, that the defendant committed a new crime by breaking his mistake, that the defendant's chest was committed one time by the victim, and that the degree of illegality of the act is not significant)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 32 (1) 3 and (2) and Article 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss Application for Compensation (the scope of liability for compensation is not clear, and it is not reasonable to issue an order for compensation in the criminal procedure of this case);