except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 01:25, the mother of the Defendant was not opening a door on the front side of Sungwon-si, Changwon-si B; (b) and (c) received a 112 report, and delayed arrival to D, the police officer belonging to the Changwon-gu Police Station C district unit of the Changwon-gu Police Station, which called the “C district unit of the Changwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.” On the ground that: (a) the Defendant was able to take the shoulder of the said D to take a bath at the police officer and leave the patrol car; (b) the victim E (29 years old) who was called together to the Defendant, was able to take care of the border; (c) the Defendant was able to take care of the victim, and (d) the victim was able to take care of the body and the body of the police officer, and (d) the Defendant was able to take care of the victim, and (d) the victim was frighted to the floor.

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' 112 reporting management affairs, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (as to attachment of a medical certificate);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. In order to establish the legal order of the country of reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and eradicate the light of the public authority, there is a need to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and there are several kinds of criminal records against the accused.

However, the fact that the defendant is against the mistake, that the defendant deposited 500,000 won each for police officers F and G, and that the defendant's violent force is before 2001, etc. are considered as favorable circumstances, and the circumstances, injuries and losses of the crime of this case are also considered.