Seized evidence 1 to 4 shall be confiscated.

On October 8, 1996, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months for larceny in Seoul District Court Branch of Seoul District Court, and on May 7, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for larceny in Seoul District Court. On October 13, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months for larceny.

On September 11, 2015, at around 03:25, the Defendant opened the front door of the 31 ton cargo vehicle parked in front of Geumcheon apartment 46, 151-ro, Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, with a construction tool equivalent to the sum of 65,000 won, such as a 175,00 won at the market price owned by the victim D, which is located behind him, and a 320,000 won at the market price, and a Hander at the 30,000 won at the market price, and a Hander at the 130,000 won at the market price.

In addition, from October 10, 2014 to September 21, 2015, the Defendant, along with construction tools equivalent to 12,382,00 won in total, from around 10,000 to around 25 times, stolen the victims’ property habitually.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Written statements of victims;

1. Reports on each occurrence of a theft;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Previous records of judgment: References to criminal records and investigation reports (where such references are attached to the same criminal records and investigation reports);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of crimes, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of similar methods in the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 332 of the Criminal Act and Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the sentencing of the instant crime is based on the following factors: (a) the content, method, frequency, and amount of damage; (b) the Defendant did not recover from damage; (c) the Defendant had three records of punishment for the same kind of crime; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the commission of the instant crime.