자동차관리법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is unfair because the punishment (amounting to 700,000 won) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. There is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court on the grounds that new materials for sentencing have not been submitted in the trial, and in full view of the factors revealed in the arguments in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing was too too excessive and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.
It does not appear.
3. The Defendant’s appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, Article 25(1) of the Motor Vehicle Management Act (amended by Act No. 13686, Dec. 29, 2015).