2. The judgment of the defendant committed the crime of this case on the face of mental illness, agreed with the victim of larceny, and the victim of interference with business did not want to be punished against the defendant, and deposited a certain amount for the victims of insult, etc. However, even though the defendant was punished since 2013, the defendant continuously and repeatedly committed the crime of this case, and committed the crime of this case only for six months after the execution of the punishment was completed, and all the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive.

3. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.