Address Kim Jong-si

Attorney Lee Do-young

Busan Address

Attorney Lee Do-young

2. KimD (********* 1************))

3. KimE (********* 4**********))

The principal of the case is the other party to the address.

2. Trial costs shall be borne by the claimant.

In addition, the instant case’s child support for KimE shall be changed to pay KRW 500,000,000 per month from December 1, 2014 to June 8, 2019 as the last day of each month.

The following facts may be recognized as a result of the record and examination:

A. On January 8, 1991, the claimant and the other party were legally married couple who reported marriage and had the case principal in the case principal. However, the claimant and the other party reported divorce on December 4, 2009.

B. At the time of the report of divorce, Busan District Court’s Family Branch, at the time of the report of divorce, jointly designates the person with parental authority of the principal of the case as the person with parental authority and the person with custody as the other party, and the claimant prepared a statement of liability for child support to pay KRW 500,000 per person on the last day of each month to the other party from the day after the date of the report of divorce to the day

C. Meanwhile, the claimant filed a petition with the above court for a judgment on the division of property against the other party. On June 8, 2010, the claimant and the other party filed a petition for the judgment on the division of property with the above court. The claimant and the other party file a petition for the judgment on the division of property under the name of the other party** in the name of the other party** in the City** in the Dong**** in the Gu** in the principal of this case* in the period of transferring the gas station to the applicant, but the claimant shall be the child support for the principal of this case

As of February 28, 2015, mediation was concluded to pay KRW 2 million per month and KRW 1.5 million per month from the following day to June 8, 2020.

2. The assertion and judgment

The claimant asserts that the KimCC and KimD, among the principals of the case, have already become adult, and that the claimant's income has decreased more than the time of adjustment, the child support should be reduced, such as the purport of the claim.

The claimant appears to have already taken into account the age of the case principal at the time of mediation.

at the time of adjustment, it is true that the current reported income has been reduced more than the time of adjustment, but at the time of adjustment, the case principals

It seems that the increase in child support is an organic combination with the division of property between the claimant and the other party.

the majority of the case principal KimCC and KimD, but there is still no import activity, and the claimant

In light of the size of the property held by the claimant and the economic situation of the claimant and the other party, it is difficult to view that the reason why the claimant takes place is to change the child support for the principal of the case.

3. Conclusion

If so, the claimant's request is dismissed as it is without merit, and it shall be judged as per Disposition.