When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 26, 2016, around 21:30 on November 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was removed from the police officer E, etc. of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station D police box called up after receiving a report that the Defendant was lost and frighted; and (b) was removed from the Defendant, before Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu, by the Defendant.

Does it be why you can find out their inner locks;

Dried fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor

The blick roof, fluent fluent fluor, fluorh, fluorh h.,” etc. The blick part of the patrol car parkeded by E was emitted twice again, and the blick part of E was cut one time by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. All elements of sentencing, including the confession and reflection of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the circumstances leading to the commission of the crime, the degree and mode of conduct exercised by the police officer, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, etc., should be taken into consideration.