However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 22, 2020, the Defendant 18:35 around 18:18:35 around 2, 2020, at the Sinsan City B, in C, nearby D, “D” restaurant, and then dispute over the business issues, the Defendant 1:00 square meters in total (37 cm, 32 cm, 12 cm in length, 4 cm in length, 4 cm in height, 4 cm in height) that are dangerous articles in the cargo vehicle (1 ton) parked by the Defendant in the vicinity.

The victim F, who was parked in his surrounding area, has lowered the glass in front of the GTP car owned by the F, thereby damaging the victim's property amounting to KRW 3,006,101 in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A criminal investigation report, etc. and a report on internal investigation (attached estimates for damage);

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 369 and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is against the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime, the agreement with the victim, the Defendant’s multiple previous convictions, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, shall be determined as ordered.