For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the violation of the Installation and Utilization of Sports Facilities Act among the facts charged in the instant case.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just, and it did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the violation of the Installation and Utilization of Sports Facilities Act, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but the prosecutor did not state the legitimate grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal and did not state the grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.