난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on June 28, 201 as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter “Liberia”) of the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter “Liberia”).
B. On December 22, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on November 30, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the “profuge of fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee 1967”) and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol on the Status of Refugees.
C. On December 29, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground on March 21, 2018.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff is a friend of the Gaberia, and the plaintiff, the organization of Liberia's secret friria, stated the English propelling of the confidential local group as "C" at the date of pleading of the court of this case, but it appears to be the same organization as "B," which is the name of the confidential local organization, as stated in the previous administrative litigation decision, by asserting that the plaintiff is a person who is friending at the time of application for recognition of refugee status, and therefore, the plaintiff should be described as "B" as in the previous administrative litigation decision.
A member of the group refused to join the organization after the death of the group.
The plaintiff was threatened with continuous threat from B, and around April 2012, the plaintiff received attack from those who could not identify the plaintiff's three villages and South dynamics.