When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From January 1, 2011, the Defendant has been working as the head of the Jeonnam-do branch of the organization Jeonnam-do branch and has been engaged in the management of subsidies of the above branch.

around April 29, 2011, the Defendant has received subsidies from 7,100,000 won from the luminous viewing on the same day under the pretext of the project costs open in Mayang-si D around April 29, 201

5. Around 17.17.Before receiving subsidies of KRW 22,100,000,000 from the Jeonnam-do Office as the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of the said branch, only KRW 650,000,000, which was actually used as executive officers who participated in the above events at a H restaurant located in Gwangju-si G at the above time, the same year, notwithstanding the fact that:

5.5.As of the past and following the settlement of the 3,500,000 Won, the remainder of the 2,850,000 Won, after the payment of the 3,50,000 Won, was used for the preparation against food provided to the defendant's will, and then, embezzled the 10,310,000 Won of the subsidies received in total four times as shown in the attached list of crimes, at will, for personal purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Written statements of J, K and L;

1. - Card receipt, estimate (M), - a detailed statement of expenditure, passbook transaction details, application of the laws and regulations.

1. Relevant Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;