In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

The Defendants were the believers of the “F church” in the West-gu, Western-gu, Western-si, and the “G church” H pastor criticizes the I who is the general assembly of the F church. The Defendants were willing to attend the worship of the “G church” and interfere with the worship.

Accordingly, on March 12, 2017, at around 11:20, the Defendants attended the second floor of “G church” on the north-gu J and the second floor of the Y and the second floor of the Y, and continued to be vain in large sounds and continuously vain in the course of H, and the Defendants called “Amenmen” and “Igggggs” as a large sound in the course of H’s snow cultivation, and prevented other members from properly listening to the snow.

The above Defendants’ act did not properly proceed with worship, but the Defendants refused to leave the church at H’s request and did not withdraw from the second floor distribution.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the worship of the “G church” in which H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement protocol (H);

1. Application of the law of notification of the results of increase in the market;

1. Relevant Articles 158 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the Defendants of the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the background of the instant crime, the method and consequence of interference with worship, the church pastor H, the worship of which is interfered with the worship, desires to escape the Defendants from severe punishment; all the Defendants are the first offender with no criminal history; the Defendants’ property status, etc.