The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 120 hours.

From January 4, 2016, the Defendant sent to the victim D (hereinafter “adial-a-be”) who is a child around May 4, 2017, and around September 30, 2017, sent a message that “a-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-and-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-bed-be

1. Violation of the Child Uniforms Act (hereinafter “child’s sexual harassment, etc.”) - The Defendant sent messages, etc. that cause a sense of sexual humiliation to the victim on October 11, 2017, around 08:30, the Defendant started hosting the victim through the above C Messen to the victim by transmitting the message to the victim at the Defendant’s residence located at 1501, Namyang-si, the 104 Dong-dong 1501, the Namyang-si, the 1501, at around 08:57, along with the male sexual picture around 08:57.

1.3 09:43 Whether the message, such as “,” is sent, along with a woman’s body photo, etc.;

South-Friendly, Lesn, “Is their body,” and “Is their interest.”

C. The message was sent to the victim, as indicated in the [Attachment] List of Crimes (1) from around that time to October 17, 2017, including a message, a set of flick, a set of interest, a set of flicks, a set of flicks, a set of flicks, a set of flicks, a set of flicks, a set of flicks, a set of flicks, and a set of flicks.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed sexual abuse such as sexual harassment that causes a sense of sexual humiliation to children.

2. Violation of the Child Uniforms Act (the coercion, coercion, sexual harassment, etc. against a child) and coercion - The Defendant’s act of forcing a child to engage in obscene acts as stated in the foregoing paragraph (a) requires the victim to take and send back the victim’s attitude and behavior that the Defendant directed by taking the victim’s uniform around October 12, 2017, and demanding the victim to have taken up the attitude and behavior that the Defendant directed. On October 19, 2015 to 20:00, the refusal of the demand is the same as the refusal of the demand that the victim take the victim’s instruction and behavior that the Defendant directed.