However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 2, 2016, the Defendant heard the Defendant’s speech that he would no longer want to do so from the first policeman on the part of the victim B (n, 27 years of age) and from March 2, 2015, and from early February 2, 2016, threatened the victim as follows.

1. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 09:53 on March 7, 2016, posted a phone to the victim using a mobile phone at an insular place; (b) but (c) intending to not receive the victim, the Defendant would die only once.

The text message, “,” etc. sent several times.

2. On March 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) taken a victim’s father’s pictures and videos using mobile phones at an influent place on March 21, 2016; (b) sent the victim’s mobile phone text messages stating, “When the victim turns out his/her father’s pictures and videos that the father of the victim’s church sexual intercourses; (c) he/she sent them to the victim’s mobile phone along with the victim’s cell phone, including “ how his/her father will cut off to his/her father; and (d) how his/her father will cut up to his/her father; and (e) how his/

3. 피고인은 2016. 5. 18. 22:19 경 불 상의 장소에서 휴대전화를 이용하여 농약을 촬영한 사진을 피해 자의 휴대 전화기로 전송하고, “ 약 쳐 먹고, 걍 뒤질께” 라는 문자 메시지를 전송하였다.

4. On May 28, 2016, around 23:50 on May 28, 2016, the Defendant left the 3rd floor window of the victim’s house located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and showed an attitude that the injured person would inflict any harm on the body, etc. if the injured person does not talk with the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (Kakao and telephone text);

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Protective observation and community service order under the Criminal Act;