When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[Criminal record] The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in support of the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of April 23, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 8, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On August 8, 2013, the Defendant filed an application for a loan of KRW 3,50,000,000,000,000, with the Defendant, at the victim Doro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government Loan Office of the Victim Don Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “C restaurant is operated along with his/her her son, and the monthly sales are KRW 40,000,000,000 per month and KRW 3.5 million per month.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was in a state of excess of the obligation, such as that the monthly rent deposit amounting to KRW 110,000,000, while the Defendant did not have any special property other than the monthly rent deposit amounting to KRW 1100,000,000, and the obligation to be repaid to the Do Governor was paid to the Do Governor as a security for the above loan obligation, and the vehicle purchased with the money borrowed from the Don Capital Enterprise with the full amount as the vehicle purchased with the money borrowed from the Don Capital Enterprise failed to prepare for the relocation cost, so even if the Defendant received the loan, it was incapable

Nevertheless, the defendant had made a false statement as above and received 3 million won as a loan from the injured party on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Around August 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) purchased a high-class car from the company FF that is located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E in order to purchase a high-class car from D; (b) received a loan of KRW 28 million from the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. on a condition that it redeems the above car in installments for 36 months; and (c) granted the victim a right to collateral security of KRW 28 million with respect to the said car.

Despite the fact that the Defendant was requested to terminate the loan contract from the injured party due to his failure to repay the above loan, the name which was searched on the Internet on December 2, 2013.