교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment without prison labor) of the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime and is against the Defendant.
Some damages have been paid to the bereaved family members of the victim through insurance purchased by the defendant.
On the other hand, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant as it conflicts with the victim walking along the front side of the vehicle of the defendant while neglecting the duty of the front side of the defendant.
Due to this case, the result of the victim's death was not observed.
The defendant did not reach an agreement with the bereaved family members of the victim, and the bereaved family members of the victim want to punish the defendant.
In addition, even if the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, and various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments are considered, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.