However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On October 27, 2012, at around 02:30, the Defendants were in a dispute with the victim E (the age of 19) on the street in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the ground that the victim E (the age of 19) driven a car while driving the car, and brought a warning to the Defendants. Defendant B took three times the face of the victim due to drinking, the victim was able to take three times the face of the victim, and the victim was able to take three times the face of the victim due to drinking and launching, and Defendant A was able to take the face and body of the victim due to drinking and launching.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victims to give approximately four weeks of treatment to the victims, resulting in a safababa which requires approximately five weeks of therapy and approximately five weeks of therapy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Part of protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Although the extent of damage to the victim due to the crime of this case committed by the defendants for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order is not weak, the defendants deposited KRW 10 million for the victim, the defendants were the initial offender and the mistake thereof are divided, the victim also provided the victim with the gateburging net against the defendants, and the defendant B used the gateburging net against the defendants, and other all circumstances constituting the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records such as the defendants' age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, occupation, etc. are considered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.