The Defendant, around 02:05 on November 13, 2014, 02:05, went together with the Victim E (52 tax) who flabing alcoholic beverage on another table in the Dakbook located in Cheongju-si, Seocho-si, and drinked alcoholic beverages, and continued to go together with the Defendant’s stairs front of the entrance of the said Kakbook. The Defendant: (a) the Victim, “Igre, Igre”, who was the victim, “Igre??????????????????”

The body of the defendant was tightly sounded and pushed down several times.

The defendant divided the face of the victim who was on the side of the main stairs, 2-3 times in a breath, and 2-3 feet, and the victim was pushed the victim under the direction of the stairs, and then the victim was unable to drive the victim's left side, but the victim's face cannot move on the stairs rail, due to drinking, the victim's head and bridge were taken on the part of the victim's face, and damaged the victim by taking about about 10 weeks of the victim's head and bridge, and 460,000 won of the market price, which is the victim's possession, by taking about 10 weeks of the victim's head and bridge, and destroying the victim's head and bridge.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The protocol of suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E;

1. A written statement;

1. Medical certificates, photographs inflicting an injury on a victim, and photographs after surgery for a victim;

1. Written estimate or destruction of a horn;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishments imposed on the crimes of serious injury);

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel at the time of committing the instant crime had a mental and physical weakness of drinking much much more alcohol than ordinary liquor at the time when the Defendant committed the instant crime.

The argument is asserted.

According to the records, the defendant seems to have drinking more than the usual drinking volume at the time of the crime of this case, but there are various kinds of actions, such as the background, method, before and after the crime.