When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant committed an act as if the victims were to purchase out-of-the-counter vehicles from the victims of early delivery, and had the victims pay the amount of the Defendant's drinking value.

1. Around 00:30 on July 13, 2019, the Defendant: (a) phone call from the victim D to deposit KRW 700,000,000 on behalf of the victim; and (b)

7. shall be repaid up to 17.

“Along with the lending of money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money. Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 700,000 from the victim to the national bank account known from the above main point of view and acquired it by fraud. 2. On 02:00 of the above day, the Defendant called the victim D again and called the victim D at the E main point in light of 02:0,000, and then made the payment on behalf of the victim.

7. shall be repaid up to 17.

“Along with the lending of money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money. Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 4,50,000 from the victim to the Korean bank account known from the above main point and acquired it by fraud. 3. On July 14, 2019, the Defendant, at around 06:30 on July 14, 2019, via a phone call from the victim F to pay KRW 1,350,000 on behalf of the victim.

‘False speech' was made.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 1,350,000 won from the victim to the Korean bank account known from the above main point.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports ( telephone conversations for reference D);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.