When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 20, 2017, from around 04:10 to 04:35 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to the effect that “The Defendant, who violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses, is a large voice, i.e., being drunk at the 108 Fash-ro 108 Fash-ro, a public police station located in the Fash-ro 1, a 108 Fash-ro; (b) “Pash-ro, who has died of an unfashed police fash; (c) was tightly fash-ro at the entrance; and (d) was tightly fashed or fashed by a rough and disorderly horse or behavior at the public office.

2. On August 20, 2017, the Defendant damaged public goods, at the detention room of the police station of the 1265-gu government police station, 1265, where he was arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, as seen above, the Defendant: (a) said that “a person who was arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, will file a criminal charge with the head of the police station; (b) said person collected the hand hand handcs with a view to a glass who was on the wall of the above police station; and (c) said person was damaged to the extent that the repair cost was KRW 75,000.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of arrest of flagrant offenders, a written statement of main officer, B, C, and D preparation, each investigation report (a case concerning the suspect A's attitude in the atmosphere of investigation, any act of disturbance for the cancellation of the head of the government office, any confirmation of the suspect's previous criminal records - closure and attachment of photographs, and a written estimate for official goods of the Speaker's Police Station);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbance for revocation in the official official document), Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of disturbance for damage to public property), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is examined, and the defendant recognizes all the criminal facts of this case.