2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. The plaintiff's succession to the lawsuit.

On the 4th 10 to 13th 13th 1 of the first instance court's decision, "(D.) rehabilitation procedures for the same kind and quality" are as follows:

D. The appointment of a custodian according to the same rehabilitation procedure was decided on October 17, 2013 by Seoul Central District Court 2013 Ma186, and was decided on March 21, 2014. A was appointed as a sole custodian of the sameyang on March 31, 2014 and resigned on April 15, 2015 when the lawsuit was pending at the trial. A was appointed as a sole custodian on the same day, and was appointed as a single custodian on the same day, and was appointed on the same day by the Plaintiff on April 15 to 16 of the first instance judgment, “2-month 92,400,000 (=46,200,000 x 2-month 46,200,000 x 2- month 46,400,000 x 2-10% of rent” (hereinafter the same shall apply).

On the fourth 19th 4th 19th son G of the trial court shall add “the testimony of a witness G of the trial court” in front of the entire purport of the pleading.

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the arguments and judgments are as follows.

as described in the subsection, the following B:

In addition to adding the judgment on the Defendants’ assertion as stated in the claim, it is identical to the entry of “2. The parties’ assertion” and “3. Determination on the issues” among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, this is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, the court below's 6 pages 6 of the first instance court's 6th decision " comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statements Nos. 1, 6, and 1 of Gap's 1, 6, and Eul's 1 and the witness G's testimony in the court of first instance."

The "this Court" of 9 pages 6 of the judgment of the first instance shall be "the first instance court."