The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that all of the facts charged against the Defendants was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

In addition, the argument that the lower court’s sentencing erred by infringing on the essential contents of the principle of balanced punishment or the principle of responsibility is ultimately an unreasonable sentencing argument. According to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. As such, in this case where the lower court rendered a more minor sentence against the Defendants, the argument that the amount

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.