When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 20, 2015, the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol in a D-ro in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around October 20, 2015, and was in his/her place.

E et al. reported 112 to the effect that E et al. al. al ging the word “webly drink,” and she was subject to intimidation from her during his/her disturbance.

Since then, the Defendant received 112 a report and sent out to the police officer “whether or not the male will have been sent to the police officer,” the Defendant heard the statements of Ha, etc., Ha, Ha, and Haman, who had been called out after having heard the statements of 112, and confirmed their identity;

It is also the police of the Russia.

The “hacker, .. Hah,” expressed a bath, “hacker’s face one time, walking three times with a patrolman’s hacker’s bridge, walking around 3 times due to bucks and tacks, walking about 3 times with a slope G’s hacks and tacks, and assaulting the 1’s bridge and chests and breasts of a patrolman on the buck and breasts on three occasions due to bucks.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to H, G, and I;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;