However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On October 27, 2016, at around 18:10 on October 27, 2016, the Defendant damaged the property owned by the victim C, who is the wife in the Defendant’s house living room located in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, who is suspected of the Defendant’s infection and is demanded to proceed a divorce, by cutting off the bar glass to be displayed mainly on the floor of drinking, by cutting the radio on the floor, thereby damaging the property owned by the victim and the Defendant.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties at the same place on the same day, and at the same place on the same day, the slope E belonging to the police box affiliated with the police station where he was dispatched after having received a report on domestic violence 112, and the sway E and guard F glass, etc., the Defendant gets out of his hand, and “the Defendant swayed to sway and dead.”

“Emar and sound enter the house,” and “Emarh, she reported on the house,” and “Emarbine, a dangerous object on the main floor of the bank, as she puts an empty bottle into his/her hand, and threatened E as she would inflict any danger and injury.”

Accordingly, the defect that F and E go to move to the police gear after wearing the police gear, the defendant went to the math, takes a bath to the math, francing the ebbbbage, francing the ebbb, and francing the ebbb, which is a dangerous object, and francing the ebb, and francing the e.g., an empty e., a dangerous object.

Dr. I will thrown off this bombus.

“The police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by intimidation, such as the need for attack, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C, G, E, and F;

1. 112 Reported case handling tables and field photographs;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol, list of seized articles, and the statutes governing the seized articles;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 144 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of special official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following factors are considered as favorable among the reasons for sentencing) is in line with the suspended sentence.