When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 14, 2016, at around 20:55, the Defendant was faced with a disturbance at the parking lot for Seodaemun-gu Seoul apartment complex, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, upon receiving a report from 112 that “E (44 years old), she was dispatched to the site after receiving the notification that “I am going against the disturbance in front of the apartment complex.” The Defendant expressed the police officer’s desire to read “I am this foot, if I do not have it, and if I am about it, I am about it?” and assaulted the police officer’s clothes and the shoulders of the above police officer as drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. There is no record of the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment, and the sentencing factors such as the circumstances leading to the crime and the circumstances following the crime, physical disability, age, sex, environment, etc. shall be taken into account equally.