subsection 1.

A. The Plaintiff is the owner who completed the registration of transfer of ownership on June 20, 2020 on the building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) on May 15, 2020 due to the ruling on expropriation on May 15, 2020.

B. The Defendant was paid full compensation for losses due to the ruling on the expropriation of the previous owner of the instant building on May 15, 2020, the Defendant and three other parties upon their objection. The Defendant was paid full compensation for losses due to the ruling on the change of the former owner on September 24, 2020.

(c)

The defendant requires additional compensation, etc. and occupies the building of this case.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts, since the defendant occupies the building of this case without legitimate title, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff who is the owner of the building of this case (the defendant asserts that he has the right to possess the building of this case until he receives business compensation, etc., but the right to possess the building of this case cannot be deemed to have been recognized for reasons as alleged by the defendant, and therefore the above argument cannot be accepted). 3. Thus, if the plaintiff's claim of this case is viewed as reasonable, it is decided as per Disposition by the assent to accept it.