beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고단1359

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power” On July 16, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual assault, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Southern District Court on January 15, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】 around 00:20 on April 22, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s primary business by force for about 30 minutes, including: (a) the victim’s main business by drinking alcohol from the main point of the trade name “E” operated by the victim D (the age of 54) in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, for the reason that the victim does not scam the applicant’s grain; and (b) the victim who prevented him/her from drinking alcohol, she sciffs the time for drinking alcohol to the customers in his/her surroundings, and creates apprehensions; and (c) the victim interfered with the victim’s primary business by force.

around 14:50 on June 17, 2016, the Defendant left the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building as a large interest from the front route of the F building. There is no reason to request the victim G (the age of 65) who is a security guard to use it as early as soon as possible, and used the victim's neck as a wall, sealed with the wall, and assaulted the victim at one time.

On June 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 18:18 on June 29, 2016, 2016, at the front of the entrance of subways No. 856 due to the unification of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, the Defendant: (b) on the front of the entrance of subways No. 1; (c) on the front of the entrance, the police officers, who received 112 report and called out for the Defendant, took a large voice without any justifiable reason, caused the Defendant to have a defect in the notification disposition as a crime of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

On the same day, at around 18:42, the Defendant made a false report at the same place as above, and at the same time reported 112, the Defendant received questions from the police officer I, who is a police officer at the H district of the Seoul Eunpyeong Police Station H district, “No fact has been reported to 112”, “No fact has been reported to 112,” and when the Defendant got re-verification of 112 reports from I, etc., he would have issued a Stick (Notice of Stick).

참조조문