When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is a person who actually operates a restaurant in the name of "C" in Asan City B.

No person who cooks, sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof shall sell or provide them with a false country of origin labeling.

Nevertheless, from October 24, 2015 to January 27, 2016, the Defendant purchased and used for 6,200 won per 113.8km 113,700 won per 1km to 7,200 won for the overlap of e-mail in South-gu, Nam-gu, East-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and offered them to customers for a double 100.6km of volume for double 100.6km (red, cupliced, cupliced, and implied) to use it in the same manner as the rest of German swine 13.2km.

As a result, the suspect used Germany's swine overlaps with each other, thereby falsely indicating the country of origin as a domestic product.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the criminal place;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing field evidence photographs;

1. Article 15 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (2) 1 and 6 (2) of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of sentencing of the instant crime, the form and degree of the instant crime, the recognition and reflect of the Defendant’s crime, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment in addition to the punishment of a non-permanent fine around 1998, and other circumstances revealed at the instant trial, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, and details of the crime, shall be determined as per Disposition by taking full account of all the circumstances shown at the instant trial.