On August 12, 2016, the Defendant suffered false injury even though he/she had not suffered any injury from A, an employee of the same administrative office in the same administrative office as in the above FF, around November 2, 2015, by using a computer, at the Defendant’s residence located in the Gu-U.S., Si-S., the Defendant suffered false injury, by using the computer.

Appellanting that “A request for punishment as a crime of abandonment of duties has been made because he/she had done an act, such as going out from the hospital, leaving the workplace without permission, etc.” and “H, the head of the F School Administrative Office, from the Daegu District Court, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, on June 24, 2016 to the court of justice No. 1 of the Daegu District Court, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, which was located in Kim Jong-dong, presented a false statement of complaint with H that “A request for punishment for perjury as a crime of perjury,” stating that “A request for punishment as a crime of perjury, was made and submitted to the public service center and the branch office of the public service center of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office, the head of which was the head of the F School Administrative Office, had attended and taken an oath as a witness of the injury case to Defendant A and testified the testimony favorable to G, and that G made a false statement of perjury to be punished as a crime of perjury, from September 25, 2016, respectively.

However, on November 2, 2015, at around 13:00, the Defendant: (a) brought about a dispute with G in the above F F at around 13:00; (b) brought about the top part of G with one meter; and (c) brought about the injury that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to G; (d) G did not leave the place of work without permission on the ground that C was subject to the approval of sick leave; and (e) G and H did not have testified in the court as a witness of the above injury case, and there was no false testimony in the court.

As a result, the defendant and G were made without the purpose of having G and H receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court;