However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 26, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 2.5 million won by the Changwon District Court for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On September 3, 2019, at around 19:20, the Defendant driven a fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fash-fashhh-gh

As a result, the defendant violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statements and statements of the accused;

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, photographs, reports on detection of drivers, and circumstantial statements of drivers;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports, and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative imprisonment with prison labor (a person who has served ten years prior to the lapse of his/her term of service on ten occasions);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that probation and community service order are more than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (a person ordered to undergo the verification of alcohol existence and necessary medical treatment, as the person has a negative habit).