The lower court convicted the Defendant of the facts charged of the instant case (excluding the part not guilty).

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on causation

The argument that the lower court erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to “injury” is not a legitimate ground of appeal, since the Defendant’s assertion that it was the ground of appeal or that the lower court did not consider it as the subject of ex officio judgment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.