Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On April 12, 2016, at around 18:00, the Defendant argued that he was in the process of performing original recovery operations in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul and 3rd floor 302 “D” and in the clinic for diagnosis and treatment, and assaulted the victim’s arms in his hands against the violence of the victim D (63 tax).

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Written statements (D);

1. Photographs;

1. A criminal investigation report (on-site verification);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a written statement attached thereto);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant asserts that D’s assertion constitutes a legitimate defense, merely because D’s assault and assault the Defendant, she saw her life threat, and she sawd and pushed her arms with the Defendant’s timber.

D was invaded by smuggling in the clinic.

The statement of damage is specific, and the defendant also made the body of the other party in order to defend against the fact that the defendant's statement of damage was being sealed in the medical room at the time of interrogation of the suspect.

The Defendant, who was fluent, argued that D’s fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous and fluorous fluorous fluor’s life, but on the other hand D’s fluorous fluor was not cited when D coming outside the clinic (the 32 pages of the investigation record). The Defendant’s legitimate defense assertion cannot be accepted.