2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized that his mistake is divided, and the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal history.

However, considering the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit, inasmuch as it is deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, in light of the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s age, sex and environment; (b) motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (c) the conditions of sentencing specified in the instant argument, such as circumstances after the instant crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.