2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

On March 20, 2016, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.090% during blood transfusion, the Defendant driven a C-gp-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the circumstantial statement of a driver driving and notify the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, which includes a suspended sentence due to the driving of drinking alcohol, has a record of punishment twice.

However, since 2009, there is no record of punishment for drinking driving.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the alcohol concentration in blood, the age, sex, environment, circumstances of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered (the sentencing criteria shall not apply to a crime for which no sentencing guidelines have been set).