When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 15, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement that “A victim would recover money at the request of the victim E to find cash left to the exchange center” to D employees of the exchange center other than the instant case at the exchange center located in the Philippines B.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to return money to the victim even if he did not receive the money at the request of the victim.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving D as such, was delivered to the Defendant against 20,000 won of the Philippines owned by the victim and owned by D (Korean KRW 5,500,000).

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.