교통사고처리특례법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On November 26, 1999, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,00,000 for a fine of KRW 500,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Chuncheon District Court on October 15, 2004, a fine of KRW 700,000 for the same crime at the Suwon District Court on July 23, 2007, a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime at the Seoul Northern District Court on July 23, 2007, and a fine of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime at the Suwon District Court on November 8, 201.
1. On November 25, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.122% of blood alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license at around 11:55 on the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license). On November 25, 2013, the Defendant driven a vehicle B from around about 300 meters in a section of approximately 300 meters from the front of a scamtainn Scam 2 complex apartment complex in the same Dong and the front of the scamas.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of the B Orler.
On November 25, 2013, at around 11:55, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license, was driving the said car and driving it in front of the said detailed apartment complex, and driving it in front of the said three-dimensional apartment complex, and driving it to the Roman High School on the side of the apartment.
In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle, pedestrian, obstacle, etc. on the rear side, such as accurately operating the steering gear, steering gear, and brakes.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was waiting for the Defendant to pass through the blocking machine on the rear by negligence of duty, which did not show the rear side, and was driving by the victim C (hereinafter referred to as 35 years old) with the front part of the Drewing-Aid car operated by the Defendant as the rear part of the Defendant's vehicle. In addition, the Defendant was getting on the part of the victim C and the above Arewing-Aid car.