폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 04:00 on February 14, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) demanded that the Defendant “E” in front of the “E” singing practice room run by the victim D (here, 37 years of age) in Ansan-si (hereinafter “E”), “E” in front of the Defendant’s singing practice room, the atmosphere was fright at the time of the examination, and D’s business ends, and D’s business ends. As such, the Defendant expressed the Defendant’s desire to read “I Chewing, I want to do so, if I want to do so, I want to do so, and if I want to do so, I want to do so.” The Defendant expressed D’s her knife, such as the left hand hand hand, and the Defendant threatened the Defendant to turn on the back, and as if he threatened the Defendant’s hand when she threatened D’s hand.
The victim H, who heard D’s lusium, was the Defendant, F, and G, and F and the Defendant pushed the H’s breath of H, and G continued to walk the H’s face one time with drinking, and the Defendant, F and G continued to walk the H’s body part in a number of times due to the breath of the h. G’s arms. G was ging the arms of the D at the end, and g faced with the wall.
As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with F and G, inflicted an injury on D, such as catum salt in need of treatment for about two weeks, and h inflict an injury on H such as light salt for about three weeks in need of treatment.
2. The Defendant committed an assault, such as assaulting the Defendant and G on the floor of J, by putting the victim J, who was a policeman belonging to the police station I district unit at the time and at the place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article, and was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112 from the time and at the place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with F and G, interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the control of police officers' crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning F and G;
1. Statement made by the prosecution against D or H;
1. Statement of the police with J 1.