Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Around July 2019, the Defendant posted the Mesenger’s photo using one’s smartphone (D) in the Incheon Bupyeong-gu B building, and the Defendant publicly insulting the Mesenger’s photo using one’s own smartphone (D), as it is obvious that the entry in the victim’s bill of indictment is a clerical error, and thus, recognized it as modified and recognized. The Defendant openly insulting the Defendant by posting a photograph of the meaning “.....”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to the reasoning of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the court shall comprehensively consider the following: (a) the Defendant’s age and behavior environment; (b) relationship with the victim; (c) motive and consequence of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime; and (b) the sentencing conditions indicated in the present arguments and records, including the following: (a) the means and degree of performance of the insult