If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

As the Defendant appears to have written indictment on July 23, 2019, " July 24, 2019," the Defendant corrected and recognized it as above.

At around 23:00, the taxi was taken in the vicinity of the Gun of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and around 23:40 on the same day, the taxi arrived at the front of the building in Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is the defendant's residential area, and the taxi was refused to pay the taxi fee on the ground that a large amount of the taxi

Since then, the Defendant received a report of 112 from the police officer of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station C District Police Station, who was called to the scene, and was urged to return home to the scene after settling the taxi fee, and refused to return home. Accordingly, for the Defendant’s safe return of home, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant’s wife and his/her father and son; (b) he/she saw the Defendant’s wife and his/her father and son; and (c) he/she continuously saw him/her to the above D; and (d) the Plaintiff was able to flick up the flat of the above D’s length with his/her left hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict measures, since the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties interferes with the performance of duties by police officers who perform official duties, such crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is likely to interfere with legitimate enforcement of law and encourage light of public authority.

However, it takes into account the favorable circumstances that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects the fact that there is no other criminal records, in addition to the punishment imposed once by a fine for the crime of immigration around 2007, and on the sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, character and conduct, environment and circumstances after the crime.