A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendants’ violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act and Defendant B’s fraud were introduced by the victim K, who had been employed as an I specialist from February 9, 2008, around August 2008.

On September 209, Defendant A sent out the land to be developed (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from the victim at an influence place (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) on September 2009. After having heard the phrase “Isn't have a fluence to fluent friend, M, N, andO (hereinafter “the instant real estate”). As a result, Defendant A sent the said situation to Defendant B, who operates a real estate consulting company, and the Defendants conspiredd to receive money from the victim for a fluent fluent money in relation to the permission to engage in the instant real estate development activities.

Accordingly, around September 2009, Defendant A introduced Defendant B to the victim of “ Q” in the restaurant of “ Q” located in Gwangju-si P, stating that “A is a relative within the city of Gwangju,” and Defendant B stated that “A tried to examine whether to grant a license to the victim. There is no problem in granting a license.” The Defendant B said that “I will take responsibility for and obtain a license.”

Then, around November 25, 2009, at the restaurant "S" located in the R of Gwangju City around November 25, 2009, the Defendants: (a) in the restaurant "S" located in the R of Gwangju City, the Defendant B was the assistant of the National Assembly member; (b) had the person who entered the Gwangju City City, and had the present U's left arms and carried the public officials on a

to obtain permission for development activities upon request by a public official;

Supreme Court Decision 2006Do203 Decided August 25, 2006

(i) there are many places to be personnel, and at least 50 million won is required;

If the last end of the day is well completed, it should be done separately, and this money should be entered to the public official.

"...... defendant A"